<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Howto Setup PHP (Apache, Mysql) on Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rtraction.com/blog/devit/howto-setup-php-apache-mysql-on-windows.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rtraction.com/blog/devit/howto-setup-php-apache-mysql-on-windows.html</link>
	<description>rtraction blog - Web Design, Web Development and Strategic Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 15:59:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.rtraction.com/blog/devit/howto-setup-php-apache-mysql-on-windows.html/comment-page-1#comment-25308</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtraction.com/blog/?p=259#comment-25308</guid>
		<description>Agreed.  There are a number of them out there which can actually make it harder to figure out which one to use. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_WAMPs).  The positives are it could work with minimal effort.  The negatives can be that versioning is an issue.  You&#039;re stuck with whatever versions of the components the latest package release used.

The primary reason we don&#039;t use a packaged solution is because we always want to try and clone the exact environment our production server is running on.  No sense testing your application on a completely different platform then what is will be running on.  Of course smaller websites this isn&#039;t an issue but full scale applications can become very picky about the smallest difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  There are a number of them out there which can actually make it harder to figure out which one to use. (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_WAMPs" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_WAMPs</a>).  The positives are it could work with minimal effort.  The negatives can be that versioning is an issue.  You&#8217;re stuck with whatever versions of the components the latest package release used.</p>
<p>The primary reason we don&#8217;t use a packaged solution is because we always want to try and clone the exact environment our production server is running on.  No sense testing your application on a completely different platform then what is will be running on.  Of course smaller websites this isn&#8217;t an issue but full scale applications can become very picky about the smallest difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.rtraction.com/blog/devit/howto-setup-php-apache-mysql-on-windows.html/comment-page-1#comment-25307</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtraction.com/blog/?p=259#comment-25307</guid>
		<description>Hi Kevin,

I&#039;d have to agree with you the the xampp is great for a novice.  I think this breaks it down enough so a novice can set it up themselves.  While I see the purpose of xampp quick setups I think its always useful to try and understand how things are setup and working.  It can really help if you need to make changes/additions/upgrades down the road.

Thanks for the link!

-Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d have to agree with you the the xampp is great for a novice.  I think this breaks it down enough so a novice can set it up themselves.  While I see the purpose of xampp quick setups I think its always useful to try and understand how things are setup and working.  It can really help if you need to make changes/additions/upgrades down the road.</p>
<p>Thanks for the link!</p>
<p>-Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.rtraction.com/blog/devit/howto-setup-php-apache-mysql-on-windows.html/comment-page-1#comment-25303</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtraction.com/blog/?p=259#comment-25303</guid>
		<description>This is a great tutorial if you want to set up an AMP (apache mysql php) stack from the individual components. 

If you are looking for something quick and dirty or a complete novice then xampp would be more ideal. (http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp.html)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great tutorial if you want to set up an AMP (apache mysql php) stack from the individual components. </p>
<p>If you are looking for something quick and dirty or a complete novice then xampp would be more ideal. (<a href="http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp.html</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

